|
|
Post by Katryna on Nov 24, 2005 10:13:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by inuvik on Nov 24, 2005 10:47:04 GMT -5
I want to know why he is drawing his gun in the washroom! Perhaps the toilet was plugged, and he thought he'd blast through it! Hee hee.
|
|
|
|
Post by bjobsessed on Nov 24, 2005 22:29:57 GMT -5
I want to know why he is drawing his gun in the washroom! Perhaps the toilet was plugged, and he thought he'd blast through it! Hee hee. Good question! Why do you need to take your gun out/off to go to the washroom? And once again, they said Blind Justice wasn't realistic! Ha! |
|
|
|
Post by Katryna on Nov 25, 2005 5:59:53 GMT -5
I want to know why he is drawing his gun in the washroom! Perhaps the toilet was plugged, and he thought he'd blast through it! Hee hee. Good question! Why do you need to take your gun out/off to go to the washroom? And once again, they said Blind Justice wasn't realistic! Ha! I'm told by a reliable source that if you wear your gun on your hip and have to pull your pants down for whatever reason, the gun is too heavy and has to come off! |
|
|
|
Post by rducasey on Nov 25, 2005 15:50:32 GMT -5
Good question! Why do you need to take your gun out/off to go to the washroom? And once again, they said Blind Justice wasn't realistic! Ha! I'm told by a reliable source that if you wear your gun on your hip and have to pull your pants down for whatever reason, the gun is too heavy and has to come off! So now, in other words, the whole town knows his business. Can't you just see the ass kicking he must have gotten from the Chief of "D's". |
|
|
|
Post by hoosier on Jan 4, 2006 17:57:53 GMT -5
I don't think this belongs in the blooper thread, correct me if I am wrong  In UTG, Marty finds a shell casing which he can't positively id because of its condition. Jim carries a revolver which I thought didn't throw out a shell casing. In Seoul Man, Jim was able to deduce that his perp couldn't have killed the other victims because he used a revolver. Remember the scene where he had Christie drop the coin and you saw a revolver vs an automatic ? Is this a major faux pas or what???  Or do I need to force myself to sit and watch both these episodes again ;D |
|
|
|
Post by hoosier on Jan 5, 2006 17:48:32 GMT -5
Whoo! I am glad no one has yet responded to this. I made the major faux pas  It was really bothering me so I caught the pertinent parts of both episodes this morning. In UTG, Marty found a slug, which he couldn't id but probably was a 9mil or a 38--there were no shell casings. In SM, Dorsey used the revolver and Mr. Yun the 9 mil. Karen said he must have picked up the casings as the crime lab didn't find anything. He had to be one quick puppy as the timeframe between the shooting and his running into Jim on the sidewalk was very small. Must have had the luck of the Irish to have the casings fall right into the pocket of his hoodie! The scene where Jim deduced the difference between the coins and the shell casing was still cool and he defintely didn't watching that again  |
|
|
|
Post by hoosier on Feb 4, 2006 18:04:23 GMT -5
I was considering little Miss Chase Eastman when thinking about Vince for the survival game and came to the conclusion that I do not like her bit. I categorize her along with Mary Beth Desmond, Letitia, Joan Tuxhorn--all those lovely , bitchy women who seem to inhabit the would of BJ.
Chase is self-centered--how else do you explain her engagement to Vince's relation? I mean, they don't seem to traveling the same social circles. I think he probably did it to get at daddy. She must be of age or daddy would have been moving heaven and earth to get her to some European boarding school to save the family from the disgrace! She does what she wants regardless of parental approval but was quick to whip out the "my daddy is a lawyer" card when Jim and Karen come calling at her fancy smanshy school to question her about the gun. If cops had come calling at my school and pulled me out of class, I probably would have wet my pants! Not Miss Eastman! Oh no! She ends up reading Jim and Karen the riot act and her comment about not speaking ill of the dead? Come on! She considered the guy a geek and not in her little click of acquaintances!
And if she and Mr. Postiglione do get married, I am sure she will still want an allowance from daddy because I doubt he will be able to keep her in the style she is accustomed to and I can not exactly see her slumming it!
Little tirade over. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by greenbeing on Feb 4, 2006 18:36:04 GMT -5
I agree that Chase is not a nice girl. But I don't think she was the one who was engaged, just another kid in the family. Wasn't Eastman's line: "Anything to drive a wedge between their daughter and my son"?
Chase is a completely smitable little girl. Look at that body language! When we saw her in her fluffy little sweater, I completely believed her capable of murdering little Joshy Krist.
The whole Eastman family gave me the heebie-jeebies. The Postiglione family would be taking a step down to ally with the likes of them.
Makes you wonder what Chase thought of her potential sister-in-law and those social circles, though.
--GB
|
|
|
|
Post by rducasey on Feb 4, 2006 18:47:01 GMT -5
I agree that Chase is not a nice girl. But I don't think she was the one who was engaged, just another kid in the family. Wasn't Eastman's line: "Anything to drive a wedge between their daughter and my son"? Chase is a completely smitable little girl. Look at that body language! When we saw her in her fluffy little sweater, I completely believed her capable of murdering little Joshy Krist. The whole Eastman family gave me the heebie-jeebies. The Postiglione family would be taking a step down to ally with the likes of them. Makes you wonder what Chase thought of her potential sister-in-law and those social circles, though. --GB I agree GB, I don't think it was Chase who was engaged to Postiglione's son, but rather an older sibling. And I just went back and checked since I too thought he said "my son and his daughter" but no, it was Eastman's daughter and Postigione son. " Anything to drive a wedge between my daughter and his son." But I don't think it is Chase since she is still in High School, but rather an older sister. |
|
|
|
Post by inuvik on Feb 5, 2006 15:37:09 GMT -5
Can' t remember his first name. But, it looks to me like Mr. Eastman (the father) is blind in one eye or has a glass eye or something. (his left eye if memory serves). It's noticeable in the scene where they Jim and Karen interview him in his office. Anyone else notice this?
|
|
|
|
Post by hoosier on Feb 6, 2006 17:44:17 GMT -5
I assumed it was Chase since they didn't mention any sibling other than the brother who was going to Princeton. On well, she probably isn't very nice either ;D
And the Eastman's are creepy and that is why I think it was one of them who stole Jim's bag and not one of the Postigliones who I think of as rude, crude and obnoxious but not necessarily thieves. He was probably after drug money. Hmmmm, wonder if he also knows Freeze???
|
|
|
|
Post by mlm828 on Feb 6, 2006 23:24:15 GMT -5
I was considering little Miss Chase Eastman when thinking about Vince for the survival game and came to the conclusion that I do not like her bit. I categorize her along with Mary Beth Desmond, Letitia, Joan Tuxhorn--all those lovely , bitchy women who seem to inhabit the would of BJ. Chase is self-centered. . . .She does what she wants regardless of parental approval but was quick to whip out the "my daddy is a lawyer" card when Jim and Karen come calling at her fancy smanshy school to question her about the gun. If cops had come calling at my school and pulled me out of class, I probably would have wet my pants! Not Miss Eastman! Oh no! She ends up reading Jim and Karen the riot act and her comment about not speaking ill of the dead? Come on! She considered the guy a geek and not in her little click of acquaintances! I'm with you, hoosier -- I don't like little Miss Chase one bit. Everyone who's been through high school probably knew someone like her. In fact, now that I think of it, that is a very good reason for being glad we're no longer in high school. And what kind of values is she getting from her wealthy and pretentious family, when she can dismiss her recently-murdered classmate as a "dork"? |
|
|
|
Post by Eyphur on Feb 6, 2006 23:59:00 GMT -5
I assumed it was Chase since they didn't mention any sibling other than the brother who was going to Princeton. On well, she probably isn't very nice either ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Katryna on Aug 24, 2006 18:34:53 GMT -5
I have often wondered why Jim's bag was stolen in the first place. Just a random crime of opportunity. If there was pre-intent, or knowledge of the gun inside the bag, that would've changed the reason for stealing it, and that most likely would've changed the course and outcome of the story. Kyt Ashatan's post about the Gun issue the other day and my response about our local detective whose gun was taken from the restaurant got me thinking about this episode. I re-read this thread, and there was discussion about the stolen bag being a plot device, etc. In the case I referred to in our town, all of the employees of the restaurant came under suspicion as did all of the patrons there at the time. Now, I admit it's been a long time since I watched this episode - at least 2 weeks - so help me out here. I do not remember anyone in the squad saying anything about interviewing anyone other than the two families involved in the brawl, but I may be wrong. I think that in reality, the family members would have been too busy fighting to scout under the tables for whatever they could steal. But, as has been said before, this was not "real life" and the writers could take it wherever they wished. 42 minutes just isn't long enough to interview too many people! And just for fun, here's my favorite screencap from this episode:  |
|
In UTG, Marty finds a shell casing which he can't positively id because of its condition. Jim carries a revolver which I thought didn't throw out a shell casing. In Seoul Man, Jim was able to deduce that his perp couldn't have killed the other victims because he used a revolver. Remember the scene where he had Christie drop the coin and you saw a revolver vs an automatic ? Is this a major faux pas or what??? 
Or do I need to force myself to sit and watch both these episodes again ;D
It was really bothering me so I caught the pertinent parts of both episodes this morning. In UTG, Marty found a slug, which he couldn't id but probably was a 9mil or a 38--there were no shell casings. In SM, Dorsey used the revolver and Mr. Yun the 9 mil. Karen said he must have picked up the casings as the crime lab didn't find anything. He had to be one quick puppy as the timeframe between the shooting and his running into Jim on the sidewalk was very small. Must have had the luck of the Irish to have the casings fall right into the pocket of his hoodie! The scene where Jim deduced the difference between the coins and the shell casing was still cool and he defintely didn't watching that again 
